The first one has some valid presence of the poet in it. I believed it for a while. But it loses energy about half way through. Phrases like, "to which he replied" drag it down. The second one is silly; I don't believe it. But for a 19-year-old, they're not bad.
The first one has some valid presence of the poet in it. I believed it for a while. But it loses energy about half way through. Phrases like, "to which he replied" drag it down. The second one is silly; I don't believe it. But for a 19-year-old, they're not bad.
ReplyDelete