Saturday, February 19, 2005

A fine kettle of fish

The Bremer-dictated "transitional law" that allowed him to escape Iraq without a shot was crafted, at the insistence of the Kurds, to allow them an effective veto over the terms of the constitution. This kept the Kurds happy, but even as the veto provision was inserted in the transitional law, the Shiites objected--but were over-ridden by the force of our occupation.

Now, however, the Shiites are contending that the new assembly can change that veto provision, effectively canceling the Kurds' power--which the Kurds covet so that they can exercise control over their northern provinces, including Kirkuk, which contains vast oil deposits. The Shiites contend the transitional law is not binding because it was produced during the occupation by the US. And, of course, the Sunnis take that same position, a position which, in effect, leaves the transitional law in effect only as to the parts that no one objects to.

Let me say this: I wouldn't want to be in that assembly this summer when these matters are decided. For that matter, I wouldn't want to be in the streets of Baghdad or Mosul or elsewhere in Iraq, where they are more likely to be decided.

Friday, February 18, 2005

I can't wait to hear

what Rummie says about the Army's destruction of photos of torture, having assured us, in Senate testimony, that the world would judge us by our transparency in dealing with the allegations of prisoner abuse.

When is it going to dawn on somebody that the Bushies are no different from other regimes that have run the US, or, for that matter, other empires--except that they're better at it. Namely, they lie and they've convinced a majority of us they're saintly. Come to think of it, there was a similar regime in Germany six decades ago.

The past is prologue

Here's a fine piece, showing what British kids are being taught about the VietNam war, comparing the revisionist version of that terrible conflict to what's happening to the truth in Iraq.

Wednesday, February 16, 2005

Upbeat? I think not

Greenspan's long-awaited testimony before the Senate was ambiguous at best. My take: He sees that the US in the long run can't continue as it is, spending, not taxing, continuing both as a nation and as its citizens to borrow from the future.

He's right, but he's not being heeded, not by consumers, not by our president or congress. At the end of Bush's second term we're going to be in the same situation we were at the end of the last trickle-down president, Reagan, who left us a heritage of massive debt that we still haven't paid. off.

Ya know, sometimes bad is better

With Kerry's outlandish push for more, not fewer, troops in Iraq, and approving, without question, Bush's 80-plus billions as a supplement for the defense department, I'm not sure Bush's election wasn't, in the long run, a good deal for us lefties. After all, what would we do with Kerry in control? Protest against our victor? Sure, he wouldn't be privatizing everything, but he's got an odd set of priorities in international relations, namely, the time-worn ideas that power makes peace.

Tuesday, February 15, 2005

So much for John Kerry

Now that he's shown himself to be a gutless, principle-less clot. I'm glad we elected Bush. He's easier to hate, and he's their asshole, not ours.

The power of the press

"Stocks Mixed Despite Strong Retail Report," is the headline of an AP story, dated today, at 11:01 a.m., EST. "Retail Sales are Weakest in Five Months," reads the headline of another AP story, same date, 15 minutes earlier, but this report by an economics reporter, referring to the same "retail report," which, in actuality, showed a significant drop in retail activity, but a slightly smaller drop than some economists forecast.

This is how the world works these days: All is illusion, spin, hype. All is lies. Karl Rove knows this and works precisely this way, over-stating projections of budget shortfall and then claiming victory when the budget doesn't do as badly; understating cost of Medicare benefits, then claiming foul when he later releases the higher true cost figures.

We've not only got to take back the White House, we've got to take back the media that got them into power and keeps them there.

The power of the press

"Stocks Mixed Despite Strong Retail Report," is the headline of an AP story, dated today, at 11:01 a.m., EST. "Retail Sales are Weakest in Five Months," reads the headline of another AP story, same date, 15 minutes earlier, but this report by an economics reporter, referring to the same "retail report," which, in actuality, showed a significant drop in retail activity, but a slightly smaller drop than some economists forecast.

This is how the world works these days: All is illusion, spin, hype. All is lies. Karl Rove knows this and works precisely this way, over-stating projections of budget shortfall and then claiming victory when the budget doesn't do as badly; understating cost of Medicare benefits, then claiming foul when he later releases the higher true cost figures.

We've not only got to take back the White House, we've got to take back the media that got them into power and keeps them there.

Monday, February 14, 2005

Tell me it isn't so

That the US is secretly arming Baathists in Iraq, using Pakistani arms to do so, in order to fashion a strong resistance to the possibility that the elected assembly might turn toward a fellow Shi'ite state, Iran, for allegiance.

I don't doubt the report, actually, because it's the kind of thing we regularly do in the world. We are, after all, the chief cause of unrest around the globe, and have been for decades.

Sunday, February 13, 2005

War drums

The media are doing Bush's job for him. On the Sunday morning talk shows--I'm making myself watch these clowns--the ongoing discussion is about nukes in Iran and Korea and what the US is going to do about them. I've heard no discussion of initiatives to defuse these situations or to deal with the problems that have caused them to arise. No, the news programs make more money when the production is dramatic, and what's more dramatic than war?